| Group |
Report |
Demo |
Total |
Comment |
| A-HK |
5 |
10 |
15 |
- good discussion on design decision
- no need to redist ospf to bgp
- difference between OSPF design?
|
| A-SH |
5 |
8.5 |
13.5 |
- no need to redist bgp into ospf
|
| A-BJ |
3.5 |
10 |
13.5 |
- explain OSPF design
- explain BGP design
- routing design and decision on enterprise network and internal network?
|
| A-CD |
3.5 |
8.5 |
12 |
- explain OSPF and BGP design
- no need to copy inform from menu and show the command (with options) usage
|
| B-HK |
3.5 |
7.5 |
11 |
- concept between routes, traffic being routed is not clear
- interaction between NSP core routers is not clear (routes learn through OSPF, not BGP)
- explain OSPF design
- no need to inject P-P links into BGP
|
| B-SH |
5 |
9.5 |
14.5 |
- do not redist BGP into OSPF
- routes advertised into BGP or not is not a security reason. Security depends on how you control the actual traffic.
- good discussion on configuration decision on routes.
|
| B-BJ |
5 |
8 |
13 |
- a clear report.
- do not redist BGP into OSPF
|
| B-CD |
4.5 |
7.5 |
12 |
- enterprise gateway does not learn routes as it is not running routing daemons
- how can internal gateway reach enterprise network?
|
| C-HK |
3 |
8 |
11 |
- not explain clear the design, who is running routing daemons? Why?
- Use of BGP is not for consistency of routing table.
|
| C-SH |
2.5 |
8 |
10.5 |
- explain OSPF/BGP design
- does not know the difference / interaction between OSPF and BGP.
- route design of internal and enterprise network
|
| C-BJ |
2.5 |
6.5 |
9 |
|
| C-CD |
2.5 |
8.5 |
11 |
|
| D-HK |
5 |
10 |
15 |
|
| D-SH |
5 |
9 |
14 |
|
| D-BJ |
5 |
8 |
13 |
- no hardcopy report
- clear, good discussion on design
|